If architecture becomes more “open”, such as the role of an operating system designer, does the role of the architect become less about the design of a structure according to it’s design parameters and more of the organization of “ready-built” or “ready-designed” pieces in accordance to the wants of anyone who wants to be involved?
If architecture indeed became “open”, it would seem possible for building and construction to be the first step in producing a building, while omitting the initial design and planning phases. Yet, would this turn architecture into another form of engineering in a sense? Where the most pragmatic building and construction techniques prevail (as long as it fits the wants and needs of the parties who will occupy it), rather than generative forms and aesthetics derived from the skilled designer for a desired party? Can this type of architecture be aesthetically pleasing and not be confused with a construction site like the Fun Palace?