Open Source Urbanism—- Shen

1  The open-source Metropolis

The dodgeball used the “check-in” started flooding in the city, it was like hash tag used in our social network, but back in 2003, this kind of words notification does it really motived the people to “check in” ?  Today our social network is full of picture and video clips. Is kind of showoff, and let other friends or subscribers to interactive with the person who showoffs and give them satisfaction. The dodgeball was like a single active action for friends up data their location, even its added with romance experience it still doesn’t seem with such motivated behavior.

In 2002 December all it cooperation have dominated the public WIFI control, the wifi become more commercial product then it used to be. But since then, the WIFI has been generalized to public. Is the commercial movement benefited the wifi popularized or the commercial operated just in time?

Urban Versioning System 1.0   

Open source could be benefits to user and encourage the device or soft wear improve itself. Does this means open source doing really benefit? As we know IOS and Android OS always. Android os is more open then IOS but the apps and software are quite unstable. So is open source are not doing well in some situation?   

The copying and not copying are irrelevant the idea from software to architecture is it consider as open source operation? The architecture could be self- building construction. And a lots of construction material retailer already support the idea. why does this open sources idea doesn’t seems positive then open source software and electronic devices?